Friday, June 5, 2009

Twitter your Way to Sales Success


We’re finally starting to see hard data on the success of Twitter as a sales tool. The results look very promising, especially for small businesses targeting locals.

Naked Pizza, a New-Orleans based pizza joint, is promoting itself to locals via Twitter and then tracking the response rate. “Every phone call was tracked, every order was measured by where it came from, and it told us very quickly that Twitter is useful,” said restaurant co-founder Jeff Leach. So useful, in fact, that he’s erected a billboard outside his pizza shop with his Twitter name. During a recent “Tweetie Pie” promotion, the micro-blogging service accounted for 15% of the daily revenues.

This is great news for small businesses looking for cheap and easy ways to market online. So how can you use Twitter to help drive sales? Here are four ways:

1) Use Twitter for “short-tail”, real-time messaging. The Twitter shelf life may be short, but the results can be potent. Leverage it for things like last-minute unsold tickets to events.

2) Talk WITH people, not AT them. Do you like when people talk at you? No? Well neither do your customers. If someone asks a question, promptly answer it.

3) Alert your followers when you are on the move. Selling your wares at the local arts festival? Tweet it.

4) And always follow the golden rule of marketing: measure everything. How can you determine the success of a particular marketing campaign or channel if you can’t measure it? So track every sale. Then analyze the results, determine what did or did not work, and make improvements.

To read more, click here: http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=136662

Do you have a Twitter success story? If so, please leave a note. Read More»

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Proven Ways to Improve Response Rates

I stumbled upon an interesting blog article that detailed 50 scientifically proven ways to be persuasive.  Below are 4 key learnings that apply to social media:

#10: Hand-written Post-It Notes improve response rates on inter-office letters. 

Obviously you can't send hand-written Post-It notes through social media channels. However, the key learning here is that personalization works and additional personalization works even better. People like to hear and see their name. They also like to feel listened to and involved. Social media is an ideal channel for personalization. 

#12: Attaching no strings increases response to the message. 

These days, people expect more for less. That's why many online companies are offering a "freemium" model in addition to a premium (AKA paid) model. If you are developing a marketing campaign, remember to give something of value (such as a white paper or 60 day subscription) away with no strings attached.

#26: Admitting negatives up-front might lead to better communication. 

#28: Admitting you're wrong makes people trust you more. 

#26 and #28 are related. People know that no product/service/brand is 100% perfect and they actually seek out negative information. This is why Yelp.com is so popular. Consumers were typically not receiving this information directly from companies, so they went elsewhere to get it. This is a tough pill to swallow for companies who are used to controlling their message via one-way communications. But these conversations are happening even if the company is not involved. So it's better to own up publicly to mistakes and admit negatives...this will actually make the brand message more believable. 

Click here to read the full article.
Read More»

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

TV Ads Get Interactive

An example of an interactive Tivo AdvertisementTiVo, AKA the box that killed TV advertising, is attempting to bring it back by selling interactive ad spaces. And TiVo isn’t the only one. Time Warner and DirecTV are among those jumping in to the space.

So how does it work? When viewers hit pause or fast-forward, ads appear as either a small piece of text or as a static box. Tourism Australia bought an interactive ad showing a photograph of a girl on a beach with the caption, “Don’t tell me I just skipped the Australia ad!” The TiVo viewer can then press a Thumbs Up button to view the ad and find out more information. After interacting with the ad, the viewer can choose to see additional information, request a coupon, watch a video about the product etc.

Another flavor of interactive advertising is that offered by Cablevision. Companies, like Disney, can buy entire video-on-demand channels. Disney is currently running videos about its amusement parks, which display a “talk to agent” button. If a viewer selects the button, they receive an immediate call from a Disney representative.

I think it’s a great way to extend a brand experience. And really, who’s looking at the ads on TV now anyway? “Interruption” advertising is annoying and, really, other than offering a convenient bathroom break, what value do they offer?

Because these new ads are interactive and therefore measureable, we’re just seeing the tip of the iceberg. Eventually, the TV will become a truly social space, where viewers can interact with others while watching TV.

For more information, go to the NYtimes.
Read More»

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

How Marketers are Successfully Using Social Media to Grow Their Business

880 Online Marketers recently participated in a social media survey. The purpose of the survey was to understand how Marketers are using social media to promote and expand their businesses.

A few fast facts from the survey results:
-88% of survey responders indicated they were using social media for business purposes.
-The top 4 most popular social media sites for business were: Twitter (86% used), Blogs (79%), LinkedIn (78%) and Facebook (77%).
-Over 60% of Marketers who have been using social media for years claim that it has helped them close business.
-Men utilized video sites, such as YouTube, for marketing purposes much more frequently than women do (52.4% of men vs. 31.7% of women).

Picture showing the benefits of social media: generating exposure, find qualified leads, social media leads to new partnerships, social media closes sales
The benefits section of the white paper is a gold mine of information. Far and away, the top benefit for social media marketing is generating exposure. 61% increased traffic, while 56% said it led to new business partnerships. Nearly half of responders indicated that social media generated qualified leads. An unexpected side benefit from all the social media exposure was an improvement in the search rankings. And for those who worry that social media is a distraction that doesn't lead to sales, 35% said it helped to seal a deal (this figure goes up to 61.62% for Marketers who have several years of social media experience).

So now we know that social media offers tangible benefits to Marketers, but it does have a downside. Social media marketing, while free (or at least cheaper than other channels) is time consuming. The majority (64%) of marketers spend 5+ hours per week on it, while 39% spend 10+ hours per week. But anything worth doing is worth doing well, right? Sorry, you can't just buy one of those off the shelf systems claiming that you can get 20k followers in 2 weeks, just by using a spam bot.

Time commitment for social media marketing


One last nugget from the survey...72% of Marketers have either just started or have been using social media professionally for only a few months. So, if you are a small business owner/marketer, don't worry. You haven't missed the boat. But I hope this report has convinced you that the time to start leveraging social media for business is now. And if you have started using it, please leave a quick comment so that others can learn from your experience.

For more information see:
http://www.whitepapersource.com/socialmediamarketing/

Read More»

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Has Twitter Jumped the Shark?

Oprah and Shaq on Twitter

Oprah is using Twitter (in all caps unfortunately). So is Ashton Kutcher and his 1 Million followers. Now that Twitter has gone mainstream, is it in danger of jumping the shark?


I don't think so. According to Social Media theory, the more users there are, the greater the benefit to all. I agree with this theory to a point. And that point starts with Facebook. Do I really need to know at any given moment what my ex-boyfriend from 6th grade is doing? All those updates are really starting to clog my Facebook feed. But I digress. A fundamental difference between Facebook and Twitter is that I can easily unfollow someone (without hurt feelings) who is posting too often. This power makes it less annoying to me. I have over 600 followers on Twitter (most of whom I follow in return) and I hope the number keeps growing. On Facebook, I have around 70 friends and I hope that number doesn't grow exponentially.


From a business perspective, the recent spike in number of Twitterers should be welcomed. More people means more potential customers. TechCrunch estimated the Oprah effect to be almost 1.2 Million new users. Obviously they need to need to be part of your target market, but Twitter is growing so quickly that some of those new users are bound to be. More people also means a higher likelihood that your message will be passed along to others (AKA viral marketing or Buzz marketing). So perhaps all you business Twitterers out there, should send Oprah a thank you tweet. Just remember to turn your Caps Lock function off.
Read More»

Monday, April 13, 2009

Businesses Can Finally Yelp Back

Yelp banner ad. Yelp.com is a social media and review site
Yelp, a recommendation website based on user reviews for everything from restaurants to dentists, is now (finally) making overtures to the business community. Starting this week, Yelp is changing a long-standing policy that will allow businesses to publicly respond to reviews. In the past, businesses could only contact the reviewer directly and beg them to change/delete the review. This approach has had varying degrees of success. As some businesses discovered, these reviews carry significant weight. Consider this: Online users prefer consumer reviews, 53%, to expert reviews, 40%, and traditional advertising, 11%. (Jupiter Research / Bazaar Voice Survey, Online Consumer Opinions/Use of User Generated Content, January 2008).

The impact of negative user reviews and the lack of a voice on Yelp has been a growing concern to businesses. In some cities, particularly mine (San Francisco), the relationship between Yelp and local businesses has been contentious and strained. So this shift in policy is welcome news to businesses. And as a Yelp user, I welcome this change because I can now get the whole story.

So if you own a business, what does this mean for you? In short, it means a lot. Here are three steps that you should take:


1) If your business is listed on Yelp (or any other website driven by user reviews), you need to follow very closely what people are saying about your business. You should know the following: the average rating for your business, the average rating for your competitors, the rating trend line for your business as well as your competitors, and the reviewers writing negative reviews.

2) If someone writes a scathing review of your product/service, reach out to that person directly. Ask for additional information about their experience and how your business could improve. Do not get defensive. Also, ask the reviewer how you can make it up to them. If you run a restaurant, you may want to provide a 25% off coupon or a free bottle of wine for the reviewers next visit. A chiropractor might offer a free session. If you offer a sincere apology and a way to make amends, the person will most likely change their review. The reviewer may do this in a variety of ways: by increasing the star rating, by providing an update to the review or by simply deleting the previous review. Some will refuse to make any changes. If you are dealing with one of those people, go to step 3.

3) Publicly respond to the critic. Do not attack the person. Correct any factual errors. Tell the world how you tried to rectify the problem. Even if the reviewer doesn't change their rating of your business, your response could lessen the fall-out from a negative review.

Any other suggestions you would offer to businesses on how to manage Yelp?

Read More»

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

What's the Difference Between Web 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0?

Last week, I attended the Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco (March 31-April 3, 2009). I found the name 2.0 interesting because many at the Expo have started referring to Web 3.0. If you are scratching your head and still trying to figure out what Web 1.0 means, don't worry. Even those in the industry are still trying to figure it out. While there is no universally agreed-upon definition, here is a brief guide to the terminologies of the web:

Web 1.0: "The Information Web". Content is mostly static, not dynamic. Companies started creating websites, which were basicially digitized brochures. Mostly one-way and one-to-many communication pattern (similar to ads on television). Finding information or determing which products/services to purchase involves search engines (Google, Yahoo etc.) or specific websites offering "expert" opinions.

Web 2.0: "The Social & Personal Web". People wanted to contribute and technology made it easier to do so. As a result, Blogging, Podcasts, Wikis and social sites became popular. Interactive features, such as comment boxes and voting widgets started springing up everwhere. Finding information or determining which products/services to purchase involves looking at recommendation sites based on "the crowd's opinion" (such as Yelp and TripAdvisor) and asking friends through social sites (Facebook, MySpace etc.).

Web 3.0: "The Semantic Web". Basically, it's Web 2.0 on steroids. As more and more people join an ever expanding array of social networks, easily managing all of those networks becomes crucial. Companies are starting to offer solutions for this problem, such as push-button updates (i.e. you update your status once and it populates this information across all of your social networks at the same time).

While the world wide web is rapidly evolving, Web 3.0 won't necessarily kill off what came before. We will still be Googling for a long time to come.
Read More»

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Darwinism on the Web: Surviving & Thriving in a Web 2.0 World

Web 2.0 Expo. Picture of Soren Stamer of Coremedia
That catchy title isn't my own, but rather one of the topics being discussed at the Web 2.0 Expo I am attending in San Francisco (March 31-April 3rd). Thought I'd share a condensed version of the learnings with everyone who couldn't attend. The discussion was led by Soren Stamer of Coremedia.

Like the Dodo bird, businesses are in danger of extinction due to the rapid evolution of disruptive technologies, specifically Web 2.0. Soren asserts that there are several things a company must do to avoid that fate. Here are a few ideas mentioned in the session that will enable a company to not only survive, but also to thrive.

1) Empower your community: Listen, really listen to what your customers are saying. One easy way to find out what your customers (and non-customers for that matter) think of your brand is to set-up an RSS feed. It's a good idea to add the names of your competitors to that RSS feed.

2) Create Feedback Loops: Let your customers write what they think on your website. I know it's tough to let go of the control, but they are writing it elsewhere so why not open up to show that you value their opinions? Then, show you care by actually responding to comments. Tell your customers/prospective customers not only that you value their feedback, but that you actually use it (i.e. by making your product/service better etc.).

3) Engage in conversations: Be emotional and personal. This is quite a switch for most companies, especially larger organizations. People tend to tune out "corporate speak" though and they want to interact with real people.

4) Enable multiple touchpoints: Mobile, Web, Set-Top Boxes etc. People want to be able to engage with your brand when, where and how they want. So make it easy for them to do so.

5) Find ways to offer a great service for free. No doubt, this one is probably the toughest to swallow. If you are a for-profit company, your purpose is to actually make a profit, right? But what happens when several other companies set-up shop doing exactly what you are doing and they give it away for free? The time to think about the consequences is now, before your company goes the way of the Dodo bird.

Click here to learn more about Coremedia.

Also, there are still two days left for the Expo. If you're in the San Francisco Bay Area, click here to find out how you can score free tickets:
http://www.web2expo.com/webexsf2009/public/content/free
Read More»

Friday, March 27, 2009

My New Twitter Obsession

Twitter Grader Homepage. Twitter Grader is a Twitter tool
Yesterday, my Social Media Marketing professor sent me a link to the Twitter grader. The tool analyzes your twitter feed and gives you a score out of a possible 100. I initially received a score of 71, which is better than average, but nothing to write home about. The website doesn't mention how to improve your score, so I started playing around with it. I added a couple of tweets and a few more people started following me. Just checked my score again. It went up one point between yesterday and today. I'm warning you now...this tool is worse than crack.

Another useful feature of the this tool is the ranking of fellow twitterers by location. I looked at the San Francisco Bay Area ranking and found several interesting people I wanted to follow.

You can also grade your Facebook page through the website.
Read More»

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Social Networking Stats -- Facebook & Twitter Rising, Myspace Declining

Social Media Networks ranking. Top 25 Social Networks
Compete.com recently released their ranking of social networking sites for January 2009*. Ranked by number of monthly visits, Facebook overtook Myspace to grab the top spot for the first time. 

This reversal doesn't surprise me. While Facebook has been innovating, Myspace has been stagnating. Facebook finished rolling out its feed-focused redesign last Fall; since then the average number of monthly visits has increased from 11 to 17. Meanwhile, Myspace also introduced feeds, but not in key areas like the profile page. Since then, Myspace visits have remained flat at an average of 14 per month.


How Facebook's redesign effects website visits



*Statistics are based on US internet traffic.







I have to say that I don't really get the point of tagged.com and I'm surprised to see it in the number 6 position. I am also really tired of getting spam telling me I need to respond to my tags.

With all the innovation taking place in the social media space, it will be interesting to watch how the rankings change over the next few months. I believe that Myspace will continue to lose steam and drop in the rankings. Ditto tagged.com. I also predict that Twitter will rise to the number two spot in the next six months. I am a big fan of Linkedin.com and expect it to move up the rankings to the fourth and perhaps even the third spot within the next six months.

For more information, see the article in Venture Beat and compete.com.
Read More»

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Want Your Customers to Pass the Word Along? Get Them into a Loyalty Program.

Customers who participate in loyalty programs are 70% more likely to recommend a product or service than the general population, according to a study. Of the people in a rewards program, 55% described themselves as brand champions. 68% of that group said they would recommend the brand associated with the rewards program within the next year.

When asked why they participate in word of mouth activities, respondents stated the following reasons: to tell manufacturers what I think (73%), to get smart about products and services (68%), to be the first to discover new items (68%), to get free product samples (63%) and to share my opinion with others (61%). 

The author of the study recommends that Marketers analyze their loyalty-marketing databases to find, build relationships with and reward brand champions. I agree that Marketers should make better use of customer databases; understanding who your customers are, properly segmenting (actives vs. non-actives, demographics, psychographics etc.) and then marketing to them has always been a critical marketing function. I also agree that companies need to build stronger relationships with brand champions.  70% of study participants stated they want to tell manufacturers what they think. Companies need to make that conversation an easier process. Use social media to listen to and talk with, instead of at, your customers to strengthen the relationship.

However, I disagree that customers should be rewarded for engaging in positive word of mouth activity. The risk is that the message becomes tainted and disingenuous. Marketers can make it easier for customers to recommend a brand by providing free product samples and an open space to share (i.e. through Twitter, Facebook etc.), without directly compensating them. 

See the full article in Brandweek
Read More»

Sunday, February 15, 2009

How Not to Engage in Social Media

Generating positive word of mouth is key. But at this story highlights, there is definitely a wrong way to go about generating that buzz. 


Read More»

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Rapid Growth in Adoption of Social Networks

In 2009, 44.2% of all internet users in the US will visit social networks at least once a month (source: eMarketer). In total, there will be 88.1 million online social-network users in the US, representing a 10.8% increase from 2008. By 2012, more than half of all US internet users will regularly visit a social networking site.


Read More»